Misleading video suggests people in China ‘face death penalty for not wearing a mask’
A video viewed hundreds of thousands of times on social media appears to show a Chinese official warning that residents could face the death penalty if they do not wear a mask in public. But the video was edited in a misleading way to combine unrelated remarks from Beijing’s justice department. People in China do not face the death penalty if they fail to wear a mask outside. However, they do risk capital punishment if they knowingly conceal their contact history in Covid-19 outbreak areas.
The video was shared on Twitter on March 27, 2022, and the post has since received over 91,000 views.
“Director of Beijing Municipal Justice Bureau: Failure to wear a mask can result in a prison sentence of more than ten years, or even the death penalty! The all powerful empire,” reads the text in the Chinese-language tweet.
Screenshot of the misleading Tweet, taken on May 2, 2022.
The claim was posted alongside a 34-second-long clip that bears the logo of the science and education channel of the state-owned Beijing Radio & Television Station (BRTV).
The text superimposed on the clip reads: “February 7 press conference on prevention and control of Covid-19 in Beijing”.
The clip has two parts: the first features a Chinese voiceover and shows officials at a Beijing press conference.
Part of the messages conveyed by the voiceover translate to English as: “In light of the issue of masks not being worn in supermarkets, buses, subways, and other public areas, Li Fuying, Director of the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Justice, says that Covid-19 prevention and control is not just the responsibility of government departments and medical institutions. Every citizen has the obligation to participate and cooperate.”
In the next clip, Li says: “If a person’s criminal responsibility is established in accordance with applicable criminal law, he or she may be sentenced to a fixed-term prison term of fewer than three years or to criminal detention in minor cases, or to a fixed-term prison term of more than ten years, life imprisonment, or the death penalty in serious cases.”
Keyword searches found the identical clip published here on BRTV’s verified Weibo account on February 10, 2020.
China enforces its strict “dynamic zero” Covid-19 policy through targeted lockdowns, lengthy quarantines, mass testing and travel restrictions, AFP has reported.
But the news clip has been edited to be misleading: it combines two unrelated statements made by Li during the press conference.
The minutes of the conference published by the Beijing Municipal Justice Bureau on February 8, 2020, show that Li — who has since left the bureau — did mention mask-wearing and the death penalty at the conference, but made no connection between the two.
Li said the penalties for people who refused to wear a mask and caused any conflict over the issue could be faced with warnings or even detention, according to the minutes.
“In enforcing [the mask rule], those who refuse to follow advice and even cause contention and conflict will be faced with penalties as set out by the law, minor cases will be given a warning, while serious infringement could be detained,” Li said.
She mentioned the death penalty in relation to a different offence, applying to those who attempted to hide their Covid-19 symptoms or contact with other patients — as well as those who actively sought out contact with others after testing positive.
“These behaviours could be considered a threat to public safety under the law, and minor cases could be charged with up to three years jail, while serious offenders could face more than 10 years imprisonment, life sentences or even the death penalty,” Li said.
A longer video of the conference broadcast by BRTV on February 7, 2020, filmed from a different angle, is available here.
Below is a screenshot comparison of the video shared in the misleading social media posts (left) and the separate clip of the conference published by BRTV (right):
Screenshot comparison of the video shared in the misleading social media posts (left) and the separate clip of the conference published by BRTV (right)
As of May 5, BRTV has not responded to AFP’s request for comment.